|
|
Pinter on Pinter
|
|
|
Gussow: Could you
trace the genesis of "Old Times"?
Pinter: I think I wrote it last winter. Yes, last winter.
About a year ago. Well, there's nothing I can tell you about that
because it was just a very odd thing really. It was one of those
times when you think you're never going to write again. I was
lying on the sofa [downstairs in his house in Regent's Park, London]
reading the paper and something flashed in my mind. It wasn't
anything to do with the paper.
Something to do with the sofa?
The sofa perhaps, but certainly not the paper. I rushed upstairs
to my room. I live in a very tall house. I usually find great
difficulty getting to the top. But, like lightning, I was up.
What was the thought?
I think it was the first couple of lines of the play. I don't
know if they were actually the first lines. [Quickly] Two people
talking about someone else. But then I really went at it. Incidentally,
you did ask me for my "fourth." {main interest in life}
Actually what it is is reading. I read a great deal of poetry.
What poets?
Recently I rediscovered Pope. I haven't read him since school.
Lines and verses are always on my mind. Donne. Gerard Manley Hopkins.
"Margaret/ Are you grieving/ over Goldengrove/ unleaving."
Modern poetry. Philip Larkin. Yeats and Eliot.
Do you still write poetry - as poetry?
Yes. I've written two poems in the last couple of years. Very
short. I wrote one about six months ago, about seven lines, but
I remember I did 13 drafts of it.
How many drafts of plays do you usually write?
About three. But that was as important to me as anything of mine
- that poem. But you know any poem is - emotionally. I used to
write a great deal of poetry a long time ago.
It does seem to me, again about the last
three plays, that they1re more lyrical. Is that something you're
aware of?
Yes, I am aware of it. I think it's very dangerous territory.
Why is it dangerous territory?
You can fall on your arse very easily in attempting to express
in, if you like, "lyrical" terms what is actually happening
to people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from Pinter: The Playwright, Martin Esslin,
Methuen, London 1970
If I write about a lamp, I apply myself the the
demands of that lamp. If I write about a flower, I apply myself
to the demands of that flower. In most cases, the flower has singular
properties as opposed to the lamp...Flower, lamp, tinopener, tree..tend
to take alteration from a different climate and circumstance and
I must necessarily attend to that singular change with the same
devotion and allowance. I do not intend to impose or distort for
the sake of an ostensible "harmony" of approach.
What you want from my writing is not self-expression,
but self-confession, and you're not going to get it. You want
me to open wide my doors ( possibly from a "moral") standpoint.
That is neither my inclination, nor, more important, my purpose.
From Critical Essays on Harold Pinter pub G. K. Hall &
Co Boston 1990
A Conversation [Pause] with Harold Pinter - Mel Gussow
(first published New York Times 5/12/1971)
|
|
|
|
|